On 12-08-03 10:05 AM, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:57:22 +1000
Lex Trotman <[email protected]> wrote:
So I think we should keep Dimitars patch available for as long as he
cares to maintain it so individual users can add it if they want, but
the variability makes it inappropriate to commit to Geany.
If the changes were properly guarded out and disabled by default at
compile-time, I see no reason not to merge the patch into master. I
haven't really reviewed the changes in detail though. IMO, the patch
tracker on sf.net is barely a step up from being local to Dimitar's
hard-drive in terms of exposure and usefulness to general users.
Pretty much infinitely, Geany without sm would be a big downgrade to
me. I'm not going to support the git branch though, and it's already
out of date.
I don't mind keeping the Git branch up to date if it helps keep some
exposure on this useful patch, but it seems I don't get emails when the
patch tracker is updated, so I dunno. I'm "Monitoring" the patch tracker
but apparently I wasn't "Watching" it, so maybe now I'll get emails when
there's updates now that I'm "Watching" it (unless I also have to "Like"
it or "Friend" it or something). Of course if you want me to take the
Git branch down instead, I can do that too.
Cheers,
Matthew Brush
_______________________________________________
Geany-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
