On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:29:49 +0200 Frank Lanitz <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 21:44:44 +0200 > Enrico Tröger <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yes, however no idea really. I guess the key is to find the correct > > language code, I still doubt lb_LU is correct but I couldn't find > > any reference on the web, seems it isn't used widely at all. E.g. > > on my system, I don't have a single lb_* translation installed > > (except this from Geany). > > According to ISO 639-1 its realy lb. Unfortunately it appears glibc is > not supporting this. At least I diddn't find any reference there for > this language (whcih to be honest I just can't believe). However. Mea > maxima culpa. I didn't check this on including lb to list of > translations. I will need to spent some investigation work here. I did and it seems that there needs to be done some manual work on Debian/Ubuntu for activating lb_LU. Christian Perrier provided a little howto on Debian's i18n list [1]. I will check later this week and let you know my experiences. Cheers, Frank [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-i18n/2009/06/msg00039.html -- http://frank.uvena.de/en/
pgpDVTgH0LpgS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany-i18n mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-i18n
