On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:17:26 +0200 Arjan van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) When you/I use modules in fortran, then the order in which the > source files are passed to > the compiler does matter. This means that the classic way of writing a > Makefile > is not so easy anymore. There are tools like "makemakefile" that can > check all dependencies in your sources and use this knowlegde to make > a universal Makefile for you for the generation of .o-files > associated with any source file > in that directory, but then Geany should do the talking to this tool > for me... Well, it's not really Geany's philosophy to include build management tools, as this is specific to each filetype (but someone could implement a plugin to do it). Geany just provides configurable commands to run. > 2) To tweak an interface between Geany and gdb for debugging modern > fortran code > is beyond my expertise. Particularly if it is not (yet) clear if gdb I wasn't suggesting you do that ;-) I just wanted to mention the GDB plugin in case somehow that was helpful. > and g95 like one another. It is access to the debugger that I really > miss in all > (other) applications, so for me this is the ultimate bottleneck. If > someone who has > done it before (i.e. link Geany to g95) now stands up, I'll embrace > him/her cordially. > Otherwise, I think I'll wait and see what will come up in the > future... Regards, Nick _______________________________________________ Geany mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany
