On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:40:36 -0700, Jason Oster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As the reporter of the bug mentioned, no complaints from me!
> Although, and this is only slightly related, I haven't noticed any
> way to identify pseudo-classes and pseudo-elements as separate
> entities. An example from some CSS I have been using recently:
>
> .sort_asc:hover::after {
> content: ' \25BE'; /* Black Down-Arrow */
> }
>
> Ideally, the :hover pseudo-class and ::after pseudo-element should be
> lexed and styled differently by Scintilla. If this is a Scintilla
> issue, (needs double-checking) I would be glad to pick this up and
> work on it.
After having a short look at it, I'd say the CSS lexer of Scintilla
doesn't support pseudo-elements. It seems the "after" is styled the
same as the pseudo-class before.
But I don't know CSS at all not sure about all this.
Regards,
Enrico
--
Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc
pgp1ybYi9shMR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany
