On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 18:41:46 +0100 Enrico Tröger <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hmm, it shouldn't append ".class" to %e, it only does this while > preparing the execution to verify that the current source file > already has been compiled (which means for javac a .class file > exists). When using gcj, you get .o files, IIRC and so Geany's > builtin smartness about this fails badly. > > Maybe we should remove this check or we perform this check only if > filetype is Java and compiler command contains "javac" assuming that > this will use .class files. But this seems like another ugly hack with > potential to be error-prone. I think we could remove the check and just let the java interpreter issue a 'class not found' error. Same for executables/scripts, just let the interpreter say 'unknown command'. Then the user can make the run command do anything they like ;-) Regards, Nick _______________________________________________ Geany mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany
