On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 11:51:54 +0100% Enrico Tröger <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 12:11:10 +0300, Eugene wrote: > > > > >Actually, I think that would be better if there was a tradition to > >poll all Scintilla releases to Geany, so users won't need to deal > >with already fixed Scintilla bugs. > > This tradition exist, in the past we updated our Scintilla to the > latest upstream version within a few days after they were released. > > This time, there is some delay for two reasons: > - Scintilla 2.0 introduced virtual spaces which was quite a big change > and had the risk of introducing new bugs (which was actually the case) > and so we decided to wait for the next bugfix release > - Limited time to do the update > > > So, switching to Scintilla 2.x is on my TODO, I'll try to get to it > once I managed to get all my unread mails done (currently around 50 > only in geany-devel). > Thanks for explanation. Best regards, Eugene. _______________________________________________ Geany mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany
