On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:44:27 +0100 Nick Treleaven <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:44:23 +0200 > Laurent Hoeltgen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > That setting only controls what Geany uses to 'comment out' lines. The > > > highlighting comment char is hardcoded, however I've just seen that the > > > source file has two lexers - Matlab and Octave. We only use the Matlab > > > one. > > > > > > We could either add Octave as a separate filetype or just make the > > > Matlab filetype use Octave highlighting (the first is safer but a bit > > > messy if the two syntaxes are virtually the same). What do you (and > > > other users) think? > > > > I think the important question in this context is how many people are > > really using geany for their Matlab code. Matlab has its own gui with > > built in editor... Furthermore, geany executes matlab files in Octave > > anyway. So why not just marking the filetype inside geany as octave and > > using the octave highlighter? > > Sounds good to me, and IMO we should favour open-source software over > proprietary anyway. If there are no objections I may change this in the > 0.19.1 release. Changed in SVN trunk: http://geany.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/geany?view=revision&revision=5174 On second thought it might be best not to include it in 0.19.1 in case it breaks anything. Regards, Nick _______________________________________________ Geany mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany
