On 8 September 2010 20:22, Jake Subs <[email protected]> wrote: > 2010/8/29 Enrico Tröger <[email protected]>: >> Maybe updating GVfs, gvfs-fuse helps, otherwise try to report a bug >> against these packages. Thanks. > > So it _is_ GVFS that is causing the problem? > > I've checked my packages (Ubuntu Lucid) and they're all up to date. > http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/libs/gvfs > > What would I put in the bug report for GVFS?! Sorry to be vague but I > don't understand what the issue is between Geany & GVFS!
Geany doesn't actually know how to save over SSH, instead GVFS, specifically GVFS-fuse, provides the capability as if the file was local, ie Geany reads and writes to it using C standard posix calls just like a local file. Therefore, as Enrico said, the performance issue is in the GVFS-fuse part as evidenced by the difference in the performance when you copied using standard unix cp which uses the same C standard calls as Geany compared to GVFS-cp which bypasses the -fuse part of the system by using a non-standard interface. Cheers Lex > > thanks for replying, Jake > _______________________________________________ > Geany mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany > _______________________________________________ Geany mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany
