On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 10:49:07 +1100
Lex Trotman <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Not sure about HTML5, but it might be nice to have a separate XHTML
> > filetype. I don't know if making a custom filetype would work but it
> > might be worth investigating if you like:
> 
> The problem I see is identifying the filetype, lots of (most?) xhtml
> tools generate files with the .html extension so you would have to
> read the file contents to identify it.  IIUC custom filetypes only use
> the extension not the contents.

OK, then make XHTML a built-in filetype. Patches welcome.

Nick
_______________________________________________
Geany mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany

Reply via email to