Am Donnerstag, den 30.12.2010, 11:29 +0100 schrieb Krzysztof Żelechowski: > Dnia czwartek, 30 grudnia 2010 o 04:53:02 Kete napisał(a): > > The GPL seems weird for a webpage to have in its source code because I > > don't > > think of webpages as programs or "software" as the template says. Why is > > the > > GPL used for a webpage? I understand it's good for some of the other things > > that people use Geany to make because those are actual programs. Would the > > GNU Free Documentation License or a Creative Commons license be more > > applicable for webpages? I think I might make some more templates with one > > of > > these licenses and/or the HTML 5 format. > > If a web page contains script, e.g. to write the markup in the browser, the > script might be under GPL as well.
In that case the AGPL may be better, since it guarantees the source to be open. With GPL it would be possible to run a server-side program without having the sources public... Well, that's philosophy at all... :) -- Dominic Hopf <[email protected]> http://dominichopf.de/ Key Fingerprint: A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0 BD93 AAB0 6019 CA7D 868D
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Geany mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany
