On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 22:37:32 +0100 Colomban Wendling <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi everybody (and particularly Cedric ;)),
>
> I wanted to add a category entry for the XML PrettyPrinter plugin on
> the SF bugtracker, but I'm not sure which name to choose, because
> there are three [1]:
>
> 1) XML PrettyPrinter ("GUI" name, that's perfectly normal)
> 2) pretty-printer (the name in the source tree)
> 3) pretty-print (the name of the .so file)
>
> I find this quite confusing, so I suggest to choose one of the "UNIX"
> names for both the source tree and the .so file (and everywhere else
> it may be useful). It would, hopefully, make referring to the plugin
> less error-prone :)
> I'd personally vote for pretty-printer if you're interested by my
> opinion, because it is simple and looks more like the GUI name than
> pretty-print.
I second this.
Cheers,
Frank
--
http://frank.uvena.de/en/
pgpWQdGjaYcO6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany
