On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:46:32 -0700, Matthew wrote: >On 03/16/11 12:18, Enrico Tröger wrote: >> Regarding the wiki software, basically I don't mind which wiki. >> Though I have some technical preferences about the software. >> >> I'd prefer to have a PHP based solution as it would nicely integrate >> into the existing Lighttpd+FastCGI setup, from my personal experience >> I'd vote for Dokuwiki or PMWiki. > >MediaWiki is probably the most standard Wiki software (ie. Wikipedia >and friends) and it's written in PHP. It also supports ReST as noted >in this thread. I've never heard of DocuWiki though, it looks >interesting too. I haven't looked at PMWiki yet. > >> I agree that the main focus in choosing the wiki software should be >> in usability for both, authors and readers. > >MediaWiki has that going for it, for sure. It's probably also top of >the pile in security and stability (assumption based on its widespread >use). Personally I don't feel too strongly about which software, but >I would think something familiar to people who may edit other Wikis >would be good. > >MediaWiki is also in the Debian repositories (at least for Squeeze).
Cool. >I'm not sure though what distro the server is running or if having a >package even matters. Currently Debian Lenny, but it'll get Squeeze sometime soon. But I'll announce this separately as there might be some downtime. Regards, Enrico -- Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc
pgpLaRasQY9qu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany
