On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 16:01:05 +0200 Enrico Tröger <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 10:40:30 +1000, Russell wrote: > > >On 1 April 2011 11:07, Randy Kramer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thursday 31 March 2011 01:43:52 pm Enrico Tröger wrote: > >>> The question about the Wiki software to use is still unanswered > >>> if I didn't miss anything. > >>> > >>> I personally still would prefer DokuWiki or PMWiki. > >>> > >>> Any opinions? > >> > >> Of course! ;-) > >> > >> I'd recommend choosing a wiki which uses a markup language for > >> which Geany can do syntax highlighting. I find it helpful to > >> write my wiki pages in my own editor before transferring them to > >> the wiki. > >> > >> I prefer Foswiki / TWiki, but there is not a lexer for them in > >> Geany / SciTE, yet. (I'm working on one, but no promises on > >> completion.) > >> > >> Randy Kramer > > > > > >While I agree that it would be great if wiki contributions could be > >written in Geany but I don't think that should limit our wiki > >selection. > > There is a MarkDown plugin for DokuWiki which seems to work quite ok > (just tested it on a test instance) and there is also a not yet > released RestructuredText plugin[1]. I contacted the author already > asking him whether he would release it as we could use it. > > Geany supports both, MarkDown and RestructuredText. > I personally hope the RestructuredText plugin will appear and be > useful, as I know ReST better than MarkDown or any Wiki syntax and > because we use ReST as well for Geany's documentation. I don't care much about which syntax the wiki markup is using. The default DokuWiki syntax is fine for me as I already use a bunch of instance of this piece of software. > >+1 for Dokuwiki. So when will be the going live? ;) Cheers, Frank -- http://frank.uvena.de/en/
pgpddh4raJc5H.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany
