On 25 May 2011 11:34, Chris Sutcliffe <[email protected]> wrote: > On 24 May 2011 21:23, Lex Trotman wrote: >> Why not just use the absolute pathname of the executable? >> >> PS Thats so obvious I presume you have tried it and I guess I am >> asking why doesn't it work, does it work on the command line? > > That`s not the issue (and that solution would work in most cases). > The issue is I have a common Makefile for both architectures that I > use (it calls gcc/g++), which works well because I set the path prior > to calling make and the appropriate compiler is used. I guess I could > pass which compiler to use to make, which would resolve the issue.
I would always recommend an explicit parameter over hidden things like setting PATH, makes it more maintainable and less fragile. Cheers Lex _______________________________________________ Geany mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany
