On Sunday 05 June 2011 10:42:41 pm Lex Trotman wrote: > > That's how I understood your proposal, Matthew, and I think it's a > > good idea. The newsletter should be published in its original > > format for future reference. However the content which has a useful > > life past the publication date of the newsletter certainly could > > and I think *should* be in the wiki. > > > > The benefit of this approach is: > > > > * HowTo information is highlighted in the newsletter and is easily > > read and understood; > > * Anyone who can edit the wiki is able to contribute to the > > newsletter; * Useful reference information remains in the wiki, to > > be added to and enhanced over time. > > > > I currently write the newsletter of Frugalware Linux. Over the few > > years I've been writing, I have written some things which are still > > useful reference information. However they're contained in the > > newsletter, not the wiki and so not easily found, nor edited. > > Putting this information first into the wiki would have avoided > > this problem. > > +1 Agree with all you said. +1
Randy Kramer _______________________________________________ Geany mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany
