hello peeps,
i notice programs such as many ff extensions and ggl gears, tend to fall out
of synch with firefox updates. On the mozilla extension developer's
extension, in the forum i found an answer from 'roachfiend', to a similar
query about a similar problem, wondering if it applies to this topic, here
is a quote from the article in XUL forum:

" Target application is what you’re gearing this for. The ec8030f7… is
unique to Firefox, so leave that alone. The minversion and maxversion is
what versions of Firefox it will be compatible with. There was a big stink
about this recently, since the developers introduced 0.9.1, shortly after
telling us to make sure and only put a maxVersion of 0.9. This does not
compute. So I recently modified mine to go to 9.9, which will ensure
compatibility through the next few versions of Firefox. This isn’t the type
of thing that mozilla will support, since they can only recommend keeping
the maxVersion to the current release, but it’s the best way to keep you
sane, so you don’t have to update your extensions every few weeeks."



On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 2:15 AM, John F. <[email protected]> wrote:

> I checked out that support.mozilla.com link, and I think they had the
> right target but the wrong solution (possibly a typo). Instead of
> 3.5.* (which is what the line reads in the download) it should read
> 3.6 (which is what it read in previous versions). I posted more at the
> link in Te's post.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/gears/issues/detail?id=975
>
> This could be a Firefox bug, as the Mozilla documentation states that
> "3.5.*" should be a valid value.
>
> On Nov 14, 6:02 pm, Ron Wolf <[email protected]> wrote:
> > thanks Troy & Te. everyone look at Te's post, follow the link and help
> > prioritize this problem as Te suggests.
> >
> > mostly to save others the effort of looking further into a possible
> > fix for this, i want to document that i found this reference to the
> > problem (or a similar one)
> >
> > http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/forum/1/398497?s=google%20gears%20co...
>
> [snip]
>

Reply via email to