GitHub user paulk-asert added a comment to the discussion: Historical issues
The main thing is that if you change the numbers, the issue mentions in existing commits will be lost/more confusing. There aren't many but for example this commit: https://github.com/apache/groovy-geb/commit/54acf785209 The commit message is: Add a failing test for geb/issues#395 by adding more test coverage for delegation of waitFor(). Also, older commits use codehaus Jira references, e.g. https://github.com/apache/groovy-geb/commit/be700038b3f Has commit message: GEB-287:Support for static atCheckWait on Page classes Doesn't have an automatic link but at least you can get to: https://github.com/geb/issues/issues/287 And it looks like there are lots of commits that use that convention. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/groovy-geb/discussions/229#discussioncomment-11653464 ---- This is an automatically sent email for [email protected]. To unsubscribe, please send an email to: [email protected]
