Same here, if possible we try to go for MIT style as I am not inclined to do software where I insist what people do with it as I feel this to be incompatible with the very idea of research.
Christian On 4/8/08 9:52 AM, "Filip Konvička" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I am also interested in implementing FloatVars. I already built a solver >> which >> works on floating variables using the MPFR library (http://www.mpfr.org/). I >> designed some propagators >> (+,-,*,/,max,min,cos,acos,sin,atan,asin,exp,log,sqr,sqrt) which work quite >> well on my benchmarks. >> I came to GeCode recently because of all the work done for the integer and >> set >> variables, but I will be glad to share my code with anyone who is interested >> in implementing FloatVars in GeCode. > > MPFR is nice, but unfortunately it is licensed under LGPL, which I'm > trying to avoid. I think that for my purposes Boost.Intervals operating > on 'double' should be sufficient. > > But let's not waste effort on implementing FloatVar twice! I have > limited time for all this myself, but with the help of my colleagues I > think we can try to do some initial sketch implementation, while we'll > try to make the domain implementation part parametrized, so we can > switch between Boost.Interval, MPFR, CUDA :-D or whatever. > > Personally, I am all for contributing and sharing code. From our > company's point of view, however, we must be sure that we can actually > benefit from that - and basing our work on LGPL code is more risky (and > uncomfortable) for us. That's why I prefer the MIT-style licenses. > > Cheers, > Filip > > > _______________________________________________ > Gecode users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://www.gecode.org/mailman/listinfo/gecode-users -- Christian Schulte, web.ict.kth.se/~cschulte/ _______________________________________________ Gecode users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.gecode.org/mailman/listinfo/gecode-users
