Hi, you are so damn right. Fixed in the trunk. Christian
-- Christian Schulte, www.ict.kth.se/~cschulte/ -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Rijsman Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 4:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [gecode-users] ES_NOFIX and ES_FIX Like to give you a heads up on a mistake in the documentation (I hope). The documentation of Propagator::advise says the following: .... A propagator must specialize this advise function, if it uses advisors. The advise function must return an execution status as follows: ES_FAILED: the advisor has detected failure ES_NOFIX: the advisor's propagator (that is, this propagator) does not need to be run ES_FIX: the advisor's propagator (that is, this propagator) must be run .... I think the ES_NOFIX and ES_FIX are mixed up, it should be ES_NOFIX: the advisor's propagator (that is, this propagator) must be run ES_FIX: the advisor's propagator (that is, this propagator) does not need to be run Can you confirm this? David _______________________________________________ Gecode users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.gecode.org/mailman/listinfo/gecode-users _______________________________________________ Gecode users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.gecode.org/mailman/listinfo/gecode-users
