Actually, that is weird as in the examples also setup time is measured. But I fear you have to chip in some more detail what you do.
The runtime between 1* and 2* should be roughly the same (why do you compare one old version against another old version, 2.1.1 is not the latest). But the statistics can be trusted, we use it all the time and we know that it does not deviate from the OS measures. Christian -- Christian Schulte, www.it.kth.se/~cschulte/ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Przybilla Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 5:24 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [gecode-users] another question about stats I made a small testing sample, I made a simple propagator and some variables subscribing to it. Inside the propagate method there is a usleep line, which is supposed to delay the execution for some seconds. When I run the example, the delay is there, however when stats are shown, they say the example`s runtime was 0ms. what does "runtime" measure? am I doing anything wrong? Also, Im making performance comparisons between some programs on Gecode old versions and between the same ones on Gecode 2.1.1, I wonder whether I should measure the time on my own or just use the runtime thrown by gecode`s stats Thank you in advance!
_______________________________________________ Gecode users mailing list [email protected] https://www.gecode.org/mailman/listinfo/gecode-users
