Hi Carlos and Cesar (and all),

[snip]
>I was reviewing them to commit the changes into CVS, but I need to know:
>  - if both patches are still needed to compile cygwin (the first one is
>newer and seems to include the second).
>  - Ales, you were doing some work for the Mingw port recently, and you
>disabled the cygwin port. Is there some reason to _don't_ support cygwin
>(i.e: don't commit these patches into CVS) ?

        I have nothing against re-enabling the cygwin port.  I did
disable it because there were problems in the past, but they were
addressed with patches like this.

>  - I don't have cygwin so, if the patches are integrated into CVS, I
>will need at least one volunteer to test them. Anyone wants to? 

        Cesar Strauss was the originator and/or creator of the cgwin
binary packages on the gEDA website.  Cesar do you have a more recent 
patch or patches for the work that you did for cygwin?  Doesn't have to
be perfect, but I would like to get gEDA/gaf working out of the box under
cygwin and at some point get the mingw port functional too.

                                                                -Ales

PS. Note, I'm quite interested in getting gEDA/gaf building and running under
    cygwin and/or mingw, however, I am not volunteering to create or maintain
    the ports.  That's latest position. :-)



_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev

Reply via email to