Hi Ales, On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 05:23:21PM -0500, Ales Hvezda wrote: > It has come to my attention that there are two bugs filed against gEDA/gaf > causing problems: > > #399455 FTBFS: fails to link, missing Build-Depends? > and > #400252 libgeda: links against libgd instead of against libgdgeda > > >From my point of view these are not bugs in gEDA/gaf. Yes, libgeda > should be now linking against libgd and not libgdgeda. Libgdgeda should > be removed from existance as it is no longer used by gEDA/gaf 20061020.
I agree. I believe the latest uploads should fix all of this (libgeda 20061020-3, geda-* 20061020-2). > In the bug report there is one followup that puzzles me: > > > Subject: actually a bug in libgeda > > This is actually a bug in libgeda; It seems libgeda is not build with > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > libgdgeda, but with libgd instead. > > How was this opinion formed? As far as I know, nobody on the gEDA/gaf I think this means "the libgeda package" rather than geda-gattrib to which #399455 is actually assigned. I overlooked the gdgeda->gd change in the initial upload of the new libgeda, which resulted in a big mess (partly because I still had libgdgeda installed here). I think the latest upload will sort it out. I hope it will get into etch, but the freeze is coming very soon. thanks, Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
