On Friday 23 February 2007 13:17, Sven Wilhelmsson wrote: > Yes, I think the same way as you put it, more or less. > I have two kind of probes, "nodeprobe" and "compprobe". > Maybe one could also have 'tranprobes' , 'DC-probes' .... > These are essentially component symbols with a set of > attributes. The nodeprobes stick to nodes, compprobes to > components.
Plugins... Possibly user supplied. There are syntax issues. I am working on it. > > I use perlscripts that filter them out from the netlist, > interpret them and the plot using gnuplot. Maybe too > complicated to work in real life. > > Do you intend to include plotting functionality into Gnucap? > Plugin? Yes. Gnucap is moving toward having everything in plugins. Eventually, when the 1.0 release finally comes out, plugins will be as important to gnucap as they are to the Gimp, or as Lisp is to gnu emacs. The way plotting is handled now is that there is an ugly ascii plot built in. I recommend gwave for nicer plots. For that, you direct the output of a command to a file, then run gwave on the file. It is one extra step, not bad for someone who knows computers, but the windoze crowd can't deal with it. It is turning out that the plugins are capable of much more than I originally expected, much easier than I originally expected. Now, it is actually easier to install a Spice C model in gnucap than it is to install the same model in Spice. _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
