On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:10:01AM +0100, Peter Clifton wrote: > On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 00:03 -0400, Joshua Boyd wrote: > > > I don't believe that 945 graphics have hardware anti-aliasing. > > However, some mailing list posts turned up on google suggest that you > > should be able to have software AA for a corresponding performance hit. > > > > What do the MS Num and MS Bufs colums in glxinfo show? > > > > One thing some googling is showing me is that AA is apparently no > > longer as simple to setup as it was on SGI systems. > > Doesn't look promising.. they are all 0!
I think that if it doesn't show up at all that it means that it is not going to be supported by software fallback as well. > BTW.. what is the difference between a GLX visual and a GLXFBConfig ? I had to look it up. It turns out that GLX visual versus GLXFBConfig is a move to seperate the visual itself (depth, zbuf) from the various other feature sets. So your program will now pick a visual and a fbconfig seperately. Actually, I don't know that this changes anything directly for your program, rather I believe it is the X server that now has more flexibility to try to accomodate the settings requested by your program. This is new to GLX 1.3. 1.3 has been out for 10 years now, but I think adoption has been relatively slow. _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
