On Dec 2, 2008, at 11:34 AM, al davis wrote: > On Tuesday 02 December 2008, John Doty wrote: >> On the other hand, we already have in gEDA a simple, >> flexible, concrete, well-documented format for graphics, >> attributes, and netlist information: the schematic format. It >> can even represent pure netlists without actual graphics. Why >> not identify limitations of that format and enhance it? > > Nice joke. >
Not a joke at all. You are invited to post pointers to clear, concise documentation for a better candidate. But please nothing more like that sales brochure disguised as a Verilog-AMS text you induced me to buy... John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
