Hi guys, I was just chatting with someone on IRC, and he was missing footprints.
Apparently: http://www.geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:scg Quotes: SMT electrolytics are designated by can diameter in 1/10 mm: SME33, SME43, SME53, SME66, SME84, SME104. In PCB's geda.inc (since the dawn of CVS history), we have: ## Surface mount electrolytic capacitor, number is dia in mm define(`PKG_SME3', `PKG_SMT_2PAD_EIA( `$1', `$2', `$3', 33, 33)'); define(`PKG_SME4', `PKG_SMT_2PAD_EIA( `$1', `$2', `$3', 43, 43)'); define(`PKG_SME4', `PKG_SMT_2PAD_EIA( `$1', `$2', `$3', 53, 53)'); define(`PKG_SME6', `PKG_SMT_2PAD_EIA( `$1', `$2', `$3', 66, 66)'); define(`PKG_SME8', `PKG_SMT_2PAD_EIA( `$1', `$2', `$3', 84, 84)'); define(`PKG_SME10', `PKG_SMT_2PAD_EIA( `$1', `$2', `$3',104,104)'); Can someone check if this is right, then fix the Wiki page please? Why do we quote SME6 for a 6.6mm package? Is there a naming standard being followed? Best regards, -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
