--- Andrew Bardsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry to bail out before 2.0 is gold but I feel that an > enthusiastic maintainer with a pressing need for a good waveform > viewer could really make something of GTKWave 2. I'm afraid > that I'm no longer enthusiastic enough or in enough pressing > need.
Andrew, do please note this info on GTKWave's website (and associate a date with this call-for-help/maintainer); do also please correct the email address (search for 'Submit a comment/bug report') to something that resolves and doesn't bounce. While on the topic, consider adding a link on GTKWave's website to this mailing-list and/or the GTKWave lists' archives (if they exist). Hope a new maintainer steps forward, a number of us rely on GTKWave to do 90% of our work (I have no programming skills else I would have happily volunteered). The one area where GTKWave really needs lots of work is its signal hierarchy viewer/selector which should try to mimic signalscan's layout and functionality (as that seems to be the golden model). Regards, .tf. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
