Hi Carlos, On Sunday 10 April 2005 19:41, Carlos Nieves �nega wrote: > El dom, 10-04-2005 a las 14:07 +0200, Werner Hoch escribi�: > > I think the spacer keyword should be placed in the pintype column > > and be lowercase, even if I cannot imaging that there is a device > > with a real "SPACER" named pin. > > Ok. Done in the attached diff.
Sorry for my stupidity the correct column is the P_STYLE, because it has nothing to do with the electrical properties of pintype. Please do not listen if I write such curious things ;-). > > The SPACER only works if the pin sorting is deactivated. Is that > > what you have intented? > > Yes. I usually sort the pins myself and leave some space between > different pin groups. O.K. I was just wondering. I usually write them pin ordered. > > After testing I can put your changes to CVS till the end of next > > week. > > No problem. I could commit the changes to CVS, but I'd like some > comments before doing so... There are a few things. In your test file the nets and the device attributes are written across the symbol. They are hard to read. If you convert the AT90S8535_TQFP.src file, the bottom pins become unreachable. You have to translate the symbol away from the origin first. The position of the graphical name and the refdes is just a matter of tast. It's ok for me even if I usually put the refdes to the upper right and the name to the upper left. > P.S.: One of the tragesym options is "pinwidthvertikal". I think it's > mispelled: in english it would be "pinwidthvertical" (with a "C" in > "vertical")... Very funny, "vertikal" is the german translation of vertical. Regards Werner
