Hi Holger, El mié, 01-03-2006 a las 23:33 +0100, Holger Oehm escribió: [snip] > On Tuesday 28 February 2006 20:21, You wrote: > [...] > > Patches are always very welcome!! > Well, then here comes my next proposal: > > I got an error message I didnt like: > Checking type of pins connected to a net... > ERROR: Pin(s) with pintype 'output': U106:11 U107:11 U101:16 U101:15 > are connected by net 'NoConnection' to pin(s) with pintype 'output': > U106:11 U107:11 U101:16 U101:15 > > As the net 'NoConnection' was ignored somwhere else in the > gnet-drc2.scm, I thought perhaps we could ignore it here, too.
Sure! It should be ignored! > So I changed the drc2:check-pintypes-of-single-net, to ignore > the NoConnection net. (I am not sure if this is the right thing to > do, though. Is there a better way to handle the unconnected pins, > other than connecting them to a nc-symbol?) [snip] It is the right way to handle unconnected pins. However, I prefer to do the netname checking in the function drc2:check-pintypes-of-nets, as it is done with the check drc2:check-if-net-is-driven. I have commited the changes into CVS. You can update your local copy. Thanks again! Carlos
