the correct type? John suggested creating a separate part id (John also likes to
create his own footprints). At a minimum, I think gschem and pcb should default
to the same labeling scheme and as I don't care which perhaps we use use the
scheme preferred in Antarctica.
George
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 19:22 +0200, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 05:41:19PM +0200, Wojciech Kazubski wrote: > > I think there is a difference in pin assignments on the 2N3906 > > parts between GSCHEM and PCB. > > > > E B C > > PCB 1 2 3 > > GSCHEM 3 2 1 > > > > I am not very good at transistors and the resultant circuit > > has some strange behavior (not all bad). I notice that some > > transistors in gschem use the EBC notation while others > > use 123 or 321. > > > > George > > There are two methods of numbering pins in TO92. One is prefered in Europe, Actually there are 6 of them. So in which countries are the remaining 4 preferred? CL< > while the second one is used in US. > Compare a datasheet of BC547 from Philips and for example TL431 from > Fairchild: > http://noel.feld.cvut.cz/semi/philips/acrobat/7641.pdf > http://www.fairchildsemi.com/ds/TL/TL431A.pdf > So both programs are correct but to diffeent standards :-( > > Wojciech Kazubski > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > geda-user@moria.seul.org > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
_______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user