> but don't fall for the trap of a zero-cost restricted proprietary > one. Such things are a serious threat to the existence of truly > free software.
Right, but the user should be able to "throw money" at a problem if that's what they need, either spending money to purchase a commercial autorouter, or paying someone to write a free one. Thus, it would be good to be able to say "PCB supports the industry standard FOO autorouter interface" and let the user decide how much they want to spend on autorouting. _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user