On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 08:25 +0200, L.J.H. Timmerman wrote: > If yes, and if a following naming scheme like "04-04-01.sym" would be > used (obfuscated symbol name for a resistor as used in the Dutch > standard NEN 5152:2004, which is derived from or conforming to the IEC > 60617 standard) there would be a "description" field needed in the > symbol and in the chooser dialog to make clear what the symbol is > suppose to represent.
http://www2.nen.nl/nen/servlet/dispatcher.Dispatcher?id=BIBLIOGRAFISCHEGEGEVENS&contentID=182734 I can't make enough of that out to figure out the licensing terms.. is it more friendly than the IEC standard? I downloaded the preview PDF, and it appears to refer to the IEC standard directly. Regards, Peter C. -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user