Thak you very much for both relplies. I would not want to start a CVS vs. SVN vs. git war. I feel theese two points as weakness of CVS, and I know git is serious. The disadvantage for me is that I don't want to check out all the repository as my local copy.
Anyway, thank you. Patrick Doyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/11/07, Levente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> >> I have a few question about git. >> >> 1. Does git handles symbolic links? > I just did a quick check, and 1.5.2.2 (which is what I'm using) > certainly appears to handle symbolic links. > >> 2. Does git handles file modes? >> > yes > >> I am asking this hence I'm pretty much stuck on thoes topics with CVS. I >> concider moving to git as gEDA did. >> > I've been trying it out on my own (work related) project. I can tell > you that for my typical development style -- edit, test, checkin, > edit, test checkin, etc... Just about anything would work for me, even > SCCS! (if you can remember that). At this point, I probably prefer > Subversion over Git, since I am more familiar with it (having made the > switch from CVS to Subversion about 1.5 years ago). I'm not sure what > git buys me over anything else, but I don't take advantage of it in > areas where it shines (such as handling branching and merging). > > Subversion also handles symbolic links, though for file modes, I think > it only supports the execute bit (but I could be wrong on that). > > --wpd > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user > -- Levente http://web.interware.hu/lekovacs _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
