al davis wrote: > On Thursday 06 December 2007, Steve Meier wrote: > > Steve also said this in private mail (I hope you don't mind my > repeating it in public): >> I actually think that one of the rather remarkable things >> about geda is the use of a macro language to generate the >> output. > .... repeated because I agree with it, strongly. > > On Thursday 06 December 2007, John Doty wrote: >> I have no strong preference as >> long as the result retains gEDA's flexibility. > ... also repeated because I agree with it, strongly. > > Those last two points are so strong that if the format fails to > meet either, it must be rejected. >
So, guile/scheme has macro capability enough, but isn't much like m4... That's not a problem, is it? John Griessen -- Ecosensory _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user