Peter TB Brett wrote: we need to be back-compatible with all the heavy symbol libraries > people currently have. > > (Or for that matter to use light symbols directly for documentation diagrams > without needing to having to faff around with a database). > > That's not say that a specific database backend (even the *default* database > backend bundled with gEDA, if you like) can't specify that, but I'm > interested in what's going on at a level which is a step closer to the user > than that.
The idea behind the sketch I posted sounds close to that... a db attrib editor can choose from the group that is related, but relating heavy list to light symbol is done in symbol view by a separate attrib. John G -- Ecosensory Austin TX tinyOS devel on: ubuntu Linux; tinyOS v2.0.2; telosb ecosens1 _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user