Paul, Your key word is "opinion" have you been through the code?
Steve Meier Paul Tan wrote: > Hi Steve, > > Thanks for all the informations you provided. > Its been really helpful and when I get time, I will > search for more info on those gEDA topics. > > As you all probably know, I am of the opinion > that gEDA/gaf is in a very good stable foundation, > to be able to allow us to implement some (for > now), in the future, most, if not all, the features > that a commercial EDA tool vendor has to offer. > I would like to see that a fully Hierarchical Parameterized > Design features set be implemented in gEDA, > comparable to some of the commercial advance > VLSI design tools. > Thanks again. > > Best Regards, > Paul Tan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@moria.seul.org> > Sent: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 11:31 pm > Subject: Re: gEDA-user: gnetlist l and m options > > > > Paul, > > The code Peter is refering to is quite stale by now. It has been my > intention to finish of a few more tasks and then make my latest code > available. > > These tasks include the completion of making the netlister a schem > script engine (hence my questions about the l and m command line > options), Move the writting of schematic files and symbols from the c > code to schem scripts (the reading of schematics and symbols is > completed), Publishing a more or less complete scheme interface for the > library, complete midlevel and backend scripts for supporting > hierarchical verilog, vhdl and spice. > > As I mentioned earlier, I am happy to let others do what they wish with > this body of work. It is geda based (thus gpl) without a doubt it > carries geda dna deeply. While I grumble about the state of geda code > the reality is that the geda developers have captured within their > code/data structures many important EDA concepts. > > If you really wish to see the latest (stale) published version I would > be happy to give you a link. If you have a little patience I expect to > be releasing a much more interesting version soon. If you are sharp at > scheme I am very interested in talking to you about the scheme interface > and the flow of the scheme script engine that the netlister is becoming. > > Thanks, > > Steve Meier > > Peter Clifton wrote: > >> On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 02:06 -0500, Paul Tan wrote: >> >> >>> Hi Steve, >>> >>> My responses are never meant to be political, >>> I am sorry if they went across to you that way. >>> >>> There is nothing political about asking if the >>> codes change would be disclosed to other gEDA >>> developers. Is that too much to ask for? >>> >>> >> If you search the mailing list archives, you will see various times >> Steve has posted links to his code. I can't recall the URL off hand, >> > but > >> it shouldn't be too hard to find. >> >> Best wishes, >> >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > geda-user@moria.seul.org > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > More new features than ever. Check out the new AIM(R) Mail ! - > http://webmail.aim.com > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > geda-user@moria.seul.org > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user > > _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user