On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 18:20 +0000, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:49:37 +0000, Peter Clifton wrote: > > > Yes, this is exactly the sort of thing hooks should be good for (and in > > this case, it will work, since we just edit the attribute, not delete > > any of the objects being copied). > > > > See attached. > > Hmm. This doesn't seem to work for me. I checked, that the hook gets > loaded by introducing deliberate syntax errors. Since I have the light > background instruction at the end of my gschemrc I can tell from a black > schematic if an error happened. The hook seems to be read without warning > or error, but the refdes number does not switch to "?". > > Do I need a bleeding edge version of gschem for this to work?
I'm not sure, please post the error messages from the log window or console. I only tested it on 1.4.0, which I strongly recommend to anyone using older versions, especially anyone pre 1.2.0. Symptoms of it working.. when using "ec", the copied items have their refdes stripped of any numeric suffix. If a "?" remains at the end of the refdes, it is left, otherwise one is added. What version of gschem do you have? -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user