DJ Delorie wrote: >> Interesting. I believe that this grouping came from the default >> generated by gsch2pcb that 'ships' with the 20080202 rpm from fedora. > > In my tutorials, I have the user create a blank board first, then use > gsch2pcb *only* to add elements and update the netlist.
Aha - now I see the price paid for following the wrong tutorial. I started with this one: http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:gsch2pcb_tutorial Now that you mention it, I do recall some discussion on the list a while back about the problems with using the defaults created by gsch2pcb. Any particular reason why that hasn't been corrected? >> Can I fix it simply by editing the 'Groups' block in the .pcb file? > > Yes. Thanks - I've made that change. Just out of curiosity, what's the impact of the incorrect grouping? Eric _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user