Hi,

I solved this quiqly by erasing the frame. So no more limits to the size 
of the schematics.
In the .sch file I just deleted the second line (something like: C 40000 
40000 0 0 0 title-B.sym).

The cvstitleblock seems to be enough.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am fairly new to gEDA, having only designed a couple of boards so far, so 
> please excuse my relative lack of knowledge.  
>
> One of my frustrations is that designs with more than a few parts the size of 
> the area gschem leaves me with is too small.  If I set to E size for example 
> I would have expected a much larger workspace and relatively smaller symbols 
> but gschem does not seem to work that way.
>
> I am trying to either get a bigger page or smaller symbols on gschem.  I 
> cannot seem to do this using gschem itself, so my next attempt is to define 
> smaller symbols.  This works great for the drawing portion of the symbols 
> using text input to tragesym but it with these smaller symbols the fonts are 
> then too large.  Editing the symbol using gschem allows me to only change the 
> text size on the description of the part, not on the pins or the reference 
> designator.  A search for parameters to set these font sizes in tragesym has 
> been fruitless.  
>
> I have hand edited the .sym file to change these font sizes and that works 
> great but even for only new parts this is fairly tedious.  I would not even 
> want to think of doing it for the libraries already installed.  
>
> I am considering writing a Perl program to walk the library directories and 
> do a mass resizing of all symbols but it strikes me there has to be a better 
> way to get more symbols on a page.   
>
> Can you tell me a better way?  
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@moria.seul.org
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>
>   



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

Reply via email to