Peter Clifton wrote: > On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 22:13 +0000, Peter Clifton wrote: >> On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 01:11 +0000, Peter Clifton wrote: >>> Give the works so far a try: >>> >>> http://repo.or.cz/w/geda-pcb/pcjc2.git >>> >>> git clone git://repo.or.cz/geda-pcb/pcjc2.git >>> git checkout before_pours origin/before_pours >> git checkout -b before_pours origin/before_pours >> ^_____ Tells git to create a (local) branch > > [snip] > >>> (Then build as usual). > > Since the latest code pushed (which has begun a slight refactoring), you > need to call configure with "--enable-gl" for it to look for and link > against the required OpenGL libraries and GtkGLExt. > > NB: If you don't pass --enable-gl, the build fails.. I didn't yet get to > the point where the GL code in the GTK HID is conditionally compiled in. > At the moment, its more a GL fork of the GTK HID. >
without looking at the code, is it feasible without major pain to have GL be a runtime selection? Here's why I ask. I *routinely* run the same binary on the same computer but with drastically different displays. On one day I might be at the computer running the program and have access to the modern display hardware that gave 1300 FPS for that glxgears demo but then I might use vnc to connect to that same machine later and have not GLX support. Should I expect a speed improvement with GLX or just cool stuff like layer transparency? I suspect that's a feature that won't take much use before I say "how did I live without this?". -Dan _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user