On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Peter Clifton <pc...@cam.ac.uk> wrote: > On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 20:17 -0400, Bob Paddock wrote: >> >> static const char * const calib_lines[] = { >> - "%!PS-Adobe\n", >> + "%!PS-Adobe-3.0\n", > > Is this saying we are using level 3 postscript? > > Do we use level 3 postscript commands?
I'd have to locate an old standard, which would be *really* old, to not be Level-3, to check for sure as I don't know what was not in Level-1. I was using as my reference Adobe's "Red Book" and "Blue Book", which were from around ~1998. I'll see if I can find a Level-1 reference. > The other (stylistic) point I noted from your patch was that you comment > on the DSC emissions _after_ printing them, e.g.: Yes. >> I don't feel too strongly on the issue (can't speak for other PCB > developers), but usually you see the comments preceding the code they > relate to, or on the same line. In my own code I generally put them where they seem least disruptive to the flow of the code. I can move them and submit an other patch, I don't have any strong reason for doing it one way or the other. _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user