On May 7, 2009, at 6:53 AM, Stefan Salewski wrote: > Of course it may be a bug of 1.4.0, I > can not test this, have only 1.4.3 available.
One could make the case that the bug is in 1.4.3. A component without either refdes= or graphical=1 might reasonably be considered an error. But the treatment of attributes in gEDA keeps changing. I wish there was better documentation on how attributes are actually *used* by gschem and gnetlist. The Symbol Creation Guide is "style manual", not a language definition. The "anything goes" approach to attributes was fine when there were few special cases in the core code, but increasingly I'm seeing strange behavior that's apparently due to the core code assuming attribute meaning that's undocumented and/or specific to the gsch2pcb flow. This is not good. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ j...@noqsi.com _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user