Stefan Salewski wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 13:49 -0700, Dave N6NZ wrote: > >> Well, then IMHO, KiCad sucks. :) Power belongs on a symbol by itself, >> and that symbol belongs on an infrastructure page, not on the same page >> as functional data flow. But that's just me. (And all other right >> thinking people :) >> >> -dave >> > > You may be right... > But if there are people who like slotted parts for which one slot has > visible power pins and the other slots have not, then we should > investigate if we can integrate this functionality into gEDA without > breaking something. If it can be done, without destroying something or > making things much more complicated, and there is someone who will code > this very carefully, the we should not say that it is bad. At least not > too loud. >
Yes, sure. Thus the smileys. <serious> Design automation tools should not force any particular methodology, nor should they preclude any if they can help it within practical reason. </serious> Now back to your regularly scheduled sarcasm... -dave > > _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user