On Sep 27, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Bill Gatliff wrote: > Guys: > > >>> And many who find "shortcomings" in gEDA don't want a toolkit. >>> >> >> I have very mixed feelings about that, though the above has mostly >> come >> down on one side. > > Is there a way to strike a balance like cURL did, which is to put a > lot > of the "guts" of the code into libraries that can be used as part of > single-function, standalone tools or combined to produce an integrated > runtime environment?
gEDA and pcb are each designed to do this. But the approaches the two projects chose are very different and incompatible. So integrating them is likely to be very difficult. A better solution for those who want an integrated tool might be a PCB plugin that can work directly with gEDA .sch and .sym files in the pcb world. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ j...@noqsi.com _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
