On Sunday 28 February 2010, John Doty wrote: > Ah, but it has an open interface we can use. A great strength > of gEDA is that the tools play well with other tools, > whether they are part of gEDA or not.
I don't care how many proprietary tools you can leverage by starting the schematic on gschem. I do care how much of a design you can do with a 100% free/open- source flow, and how well that kind of flow works. I do care about a migration path to encourage people to move from proprietary flows to free/open-source flows. I do care about cooperation between free/open-source tools, whether they are part of gEDA or not. I do care about welcoming those who are making free/open-source tools, adding to how much of a design you can do with a 100% free/open-source flow, whether they are part of gEDA or not. I do care about welcoming researchers, who are creating the new state of the art, the tools of the future. I do care about welcoming hobbyists, who are creating our culture and future. _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user