Peter Clifton wrote: > Having looked at it, I think it is pretty safe just to remove the CRASH > statements in the hidnogui HID. (Both invalidate_lr and invalidate_all). > > Alternatively, we would have to provide a NOP implementation of the two > invalidate calls in each HID. I'd suggest (if this route is taken), > making a new common helpers routine (perhaps rename drawhelpers.c), and > provide NOP "common_invalidate_{lr,all}" functions which the non-GUI > HIDs can all use. > > I've pushed out some groundwork, removing various cruft such as the > init_done flag (I think Ineiev had a similar patch), and removing the > third, unused invalidate_wh method.
So, what does this mean for the actions-with-export-HID-patch? Do I need to do some polishing? > As regards the printing.. I think it would be nice if the exporter HIDs > took an explicit command-line parameter to determine which side of the > board to export. The PNG exporter already does this for photo-mode. Yes, the "bottomside" keyword in the layer stack string is not very user friendly. ---<(kaimartin)>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0B9F53 _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user