Hi; On 4/18/10, Jared Casper <jaredcas...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think it makes the build much cleaner and readable overall and, more > importantly, makes the errors and warnings much easier to see.
Actually, I don't think so; the build itself does not change, the readability arguably decreases (I'll need an extra step to switch on the full mode). > I decided to send it here instead of the patch tracker for two > reasons: 1) Feedback to see if people like this style of build > output. 2) Testing. I don't have a box that has autoconf > 2.60 and > automake < 1.11 (I either have servers that have been up for ever and > still on autoconf < 2.60 or desktops that are very up to date and have > automake >= 1.11.) I'd be surprised if it broke things with automake > < 1.11, but that needs testing. It works for me with autoconf-2.63, automake-1.10.2; that is, nothing changes. Some of patches from my collection will need to be rebased manually, but I have no other objections. Thanks, Ineiev _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user