Windell H. Oskay wrote: > Wow. These screenshots are incredible. > > Please excuse my naive question, but is this something that the rest of us > can expect to see in PCB someday?
I tried to use the 3D view for regular work a few moths ago (medium density, 4-layer, analog layout). Turns out, it makes routing/placing more confusing than pure 2D vertical view. It is difficult to tell the distance of objects on different layers. After all, the physical screen is 2D an the layout problem is almost 2D. IMHO, the big advantage of Peters GL version is transparency. Plus, a few extra features. For example, snap to the middle of pads rather than to the end of the paths the pad is build from. ---<)kaimartin(>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak tel: +49-511-762-2895 Universität Hannover, Inst. für Quantenoptik fax: +49-511-762-2211 Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover http://www.iqo.uni-hannover.de GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Knaak+kmk&op=get _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user