On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Armin Faltl <armin.fa...@aon.at> wrote: > There are blackboards for freelance engineers, to make a defined feature in > opensource software. This seems a good model of payment to me. The problem > to me in our case is atm: > - the writer of a certain feature is not required to understand enough of > the app, > to avoid new bugs in other parts > - the writer is not required to run extensive regression tests after the > change > and provide tests for his feature as well > - there is noone fully coordinating the work of contributors and > saveguarding > the internal interfaces > > Since we do not have the documentation Bob requests, it's practically > impossible, > to meet above standards and without above quality measure in place I'm > unwilling > to pay any money. > > Btw., fixing bugs in a well designed, well documented, cleanly written > application > is a lot more fun than in <insert_decription_of_choice> and orders of > magnitude faster. > That's why I suggested to personally throw out BS like '#define END_LOOP }}' > and > all it entails. Since this was not welcomed, I decided to not try and dive > into > the code any further.
Yes, if you were having difficulty with the END_LOOP macro, I can understand why you didn't venture any deeper into the code. Best wishes, Anthony _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user