> In any case, it seems to me that the user should get an error message
> (from spice-sdb) in this case, as an explicit "?" here means that the
> user has neither set the attribute to something useful nor deleted it as
> irrelevant.
So what you are saying is that you think we should get rid of the "WTF?"
function in the code, but not modify the symbol library?
Peter
--
Peter Brett <pe...@peter-b.co.uk>
Remote Sensing Research Group
Surrey Space Centre
----- Original message -----
>
> On Dec 16, 2010, at 9:29 PM, c...@eugeneweb.com wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure we're on the same page here. That pice of legacy code is
> > what we want to remove. We don't want any code to reinterpret
> > attributes. For the short term we would like to change a few
> > probramatic symbols so we don't have to have special cases in the code.
>
> But the "?" is there to tell you, when looking at the symbol in gschem,
> that you *need* to edit the attribute (I use those symbols a lot).
>
> I'm puzzled here, because I thought Stuart was the author of both
> spice-sdb and the symbols in question, so the "WTF?" is strange.
>
>
> John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
> http://www.noqsi.com/
> j...@noqsi.com
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@moria.seul.org
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
